When against all establishment enforced sensibilities of the 20th century, Russian Professor Sergei Nilus published the infamous “Protocols Of the Elders Of Zion”, the world was terrified at not just the contents, but more so how they were coming true. Shortly after its publication, international Zionism and its organs began a fierce campaign to censor and discredit this sensational discovery, claiming mostly that the Protocols were constructed by Tsarist secret police. But as time goes on, the Protocols are vindicated more every day by those who pay attention to current events.
In recent years, the Arab world has seen perpetual turmoil. Beginning with the American invasion of Iraq, which successfully deposed of Saddam Hussein, and now continuing with what has been proven to be the CIA and Mossad orchestrated “Arab Spring”, the events in Syria and now a civil war in Egypt that could start at any minute are the crescendo of the “new protocols”.
Are the modern protocols really just a conspiracy theory as they insist, or is this sinister plan orchestrated in the interest of security for Israel via subduing all potential resistance to its aspirations in the Arab world?
Furthermore, do we necessarily need to refer to the hotly debated, classic “Protocols”, when we have statements made by the World Zionist Organization that sound exactly the same? A 1982 article from a revue named “Kivounim” published in Jerusalem by the World Zionist Organization titled “On The Strategic Plans Of Israel For The 80’s”, the following goals are stated:
“As a centralized body, Egypt is already a corpse, especially if one takes account of the ever more violent confrontation between muslims and christians. Its division into distinct geographical provinces must be our political objective for the 90’s, on the western front.
Once Egypt has been thus dislocated and deprived of central power, countries like Libya, Sudan and others farther away will experience the same dissolution. The formation of a Coptic state in Upper Egypt, and of small regional entities of little size is the key to a historic development which has been slowed down by the peace agreement, but is inescapable in the long term.
In spite of appearances, the western front presents fewer problems than the one in the east. The partition of Lebanon into five provinces… Will prefigure what will happen all over the Arab world. The disintegration of Syria and Iraq into regions, based on ethnic or religious criteria, must be, in the long term, a primary goal for Israel, the first step being the destruction of the military power of these states.
The ethnic structures of Syria expose it to a dismantling which could lead to the creation of a Shiite state along the coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo region and another one in Damascus, and a Druze entity which might hope to constitute its own state – perhaps on our Golan – in any case with Houran and the north of Jordan… Such a state would be, in the long term, a guarantee of peace and security in the region. It is an objective which is already within our reach.
Oil-rich, and victim of internal strife, Iraq is in the Israeli firing line. Its dissolution would be, for us, more important than Syria’s, because it is Iraq which, in the short term, represents the more serious threat for Israel.”
With mathematical precision, we see this text coming true today in Iraq, Syria, and Egypt.
Golden Dawn As The Initial And Consistent Party Against Greek Role In Syria!
The moment talks began to circulate about this strike on Syria, the Golden Dawn Press Office adopted this official announcement: “No facility to the Zionist-American plan to bomb the free people of Syria. A corrupt coalition turned Greece into a protectorate of foreign forces. Venizelos and Avramopoulos talk about crimes yet simultaneously support the Islamic butchers of Al-Qaeda. Greece is required to defend its national interests and abstrain completely from the dirty plans of the USA, which could even lead to a nuclear war.”